Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:47

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Man Killed by Police After Spiraling Into ChatGPT-Driven Psychosis - futurism.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
"Elio" lands Pixar's worst box office debut - Axios
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Updates To UFC 317: Topuria vs Oliveira - UFC.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why was the rock band Kiss so successful?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
EchoStar Soars 49% As Trump Urges FCC To Settle Dispute - Investor's Business Daily
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Nvidia, Other Chip Stocks Slide Amid Worries About US-China Trade Tensions - Investopedia
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How does ChatGPT compare to Claude AI?
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.